The Economist: Staff Writers: Margaret Thatcher: Freedom Fighter: Moving a Socialist-State to The Right



Margaret Thatcher: Freedom fighter | The Economist.

To understand British-Conservatism or Thatcherism you have to know the differences between British-Conservatism and American-Conservatism or even Canadian-Conservatism. Because they are all different and to use as an example. American-Conservatism even though a lot of so called Conservatives look more like religious or cultural-Conservatives, Neoconservatives even. People who are less individualistic and believe in less personal-freedom and more Collectivist or Statist on. Social-issues but American-Conservatism in its classic sense looks more Libertarian. Conservative-Libertarian even then British-Conservatism which isn’t antigovernment unlike what. American-Conservatism tends to sound like today but anti big-government in the sense that. British-Conservatives do not believe its the job of government to take care of people who otherwise. Could take care of themselves and perhaps just need an opportunity to be able to do that for themselves. And British-Conservatives certainly do not believe its the job of government to run industries or companies.

To also understand what’s known as Thatcherism or British-Conservatism. You have to know the situation that Britain was in politically or and economically when Maggie Thatcher and the. Conservatives came to power in the late 1970s and that they basically inherited a Socialist-paradise ideologically. Where the U.K. Government’s job was to literally take care of people and meet peoples basic needs and even run companies and industries. Like airlines and banks and oil companies to use as examples. So any move that the Conservatives made to the right in 1979 or the 1980s was going to look very Conservative especially in a Socialist state like Britain. Maggie Thatcher didn’t set out to destroy Socialism or trade-unions or the welfare-state but to. Modernize it and move it to the right and so people who were able to take care of themselves were now. Expected to be able to take care of themselves.

By American standards British-Conservatism by the time Prime Minister Thatcher left power in 1990. Almost looks like Eisenhower-Conservatism that wasn’t so much antigovernment but was pro-freedom. And pro-individualism that people who can should take care of themselves and for the people who can’t because they are disabled. Or out of work that government can help these people why they transition themselves to go back to work. And only be there to take care of the people who simply are mentally and physically able to take care of themselves. And compared with where Britain was politically before Maggie Thatcher came to power, thats looks very Conservative.


About Erik Schneider

Full-time blogger on a multiple ray of topics and subjects, because of multiple interests.
This entry was posted in British Affairs and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s